<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stereotypes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/</link>
	<description>...Oh, What Fresh Hell Is This?..</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Longing for Holiday</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17284</link>
		<dc:creator>Longing for Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17284</guid>
		<description>Good points, tho sometimes anger is like a released valve in me (which I suppose says that the anger is always there, lurking beneath).  I like what a friend once said: Humility is not thinking less of yourself, but thinking of yourself less (often). I think true maturity is when you can get away from yourself enough to not have to focus on yourself, build yourself up in others' eyes, defend yourself, etc., etc. When you can just rest in being you, and, therefore, focus outward. Sorry no comment in a while. Having some rough spots (see blog).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, tho sometimes anger is like a released valve in me (which I suppose says that the anger is always there, lurking beneath).  I like what a friend once said: Humility is not thinking less of yourself, but thinking of yourself less (often). I think true maturity is when you can get away from yourself enough to not have to focus on yourself, build yourself up in others&#8217; eyes, defend yourself, etc., etc. When you can just rest in being you, and, therefore, focus outward. Sorry no comment in a while. Having some rough spots (see blog).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17204</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 02:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17204</guid>
		<description>True.

The world is inhabited by posers.  Those who want to make themselves and others believe they're anointed...by God in some cases; misplaced ego in most.  

What is sophistication, really Lorraine?  Knowing which fork to use during a specific course of a formal meal?   That's only partly the definition.  I think it a  defined and refined knowledge that comes through the acceptance of outside influences.  It's emotionally and philosophically leaving the comfort of your own mental backyard. I suppose it could be akin to mind expansion, the very concept so many espoused in the 60's...but it's more than that, too.  It's not through drugs as it was 40 years ago...it's through enlightenment.  

The most "sophisticated" person I know didn't have the elan of Jackie Kennedy, or the poise of Grace Kelly nor did he live in   luxury like the erudite William F. Buckley.  This was a guy who lived in a tiny, cramped apartment he shared with stacks upon stacks of books.  He was incredibly literate.  When he spoke about a subject, I listened because he not only knew enough about that topic, but he also knew the back stories to antithetical topics. 

I grasped what he'd say about Christian tenets, because he also knew about the Koran and Vedic principles and of course, the Talmud.   He didn't suffer from myopia like so  many people I know.  He understood what it takes to fully understand.      

He also had the decency and the common sense not to laud his extremely well versed and well reasoned opinion over anyone.

That said, I think all too often, we confuse snobbery for class  and we're also lead to believe that being angry can be equated to deep thinking.   

Hardly.

Being angry just makes you a candidate for a stroke.

------------------------------------------30-----------------------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True.</p>
<p>The world is inhabited by posers.  Those who want to make themselves and others believe they&#8217;re anointed&#8230;by God in some cases; misplaced ego in most.  </p>
<p>What is sophistication, really Lorraine?  Knowing which fork to use during a specific course of a formal meal?   That&#8217;s only partly the definition.  I think it a  defined and refined knowledge that comes through the acceptance of outside influences.  It&#8217;s emotionally and philosophically leaving the comfort of your own mental backyard. I suppose it could be akin to mind expansion, the very concept so many espoused in the 60&#8217;s&#8230;but it&#8217;s more than that, too.  It&#8217;s not through drugs as it was 40 years ago&#8230;it&#8217;s through enlightenment.  </p>
<p>The most &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; person I know didn&#8217;t have the elan of Jackie Kennedy, or the poise of Grace Kelly nor did he live in   luxury like the erudite William F. Buckley.  This was a guy who lived in a tiny, cramped apartment he shared with stacks upon stacks of books.  He was incredibly literate.  When he spoke about a subject, I listened because he not only knew enough about that topic, but he also knew the back stories to antithetical topics. </p>
<p>I grasped what he&#8217;d say about Christian tenets, because he also knew about the Koran and Vedic principles and of course, the Talmud.   He didn&#8217;t suffer from myopia like so  many people I know.  He understood what it takes to fully understand.      </p>
<p>He also had the decency and the common sense not to laud his extremely well versed and well reasoned opinion over anyone.</p>
<p>That said, I think all too often, we confuse snobbery for class  and we&#8217;re also lead to believe that being angry can be equated to deep thinking.   </p>
<p>Hardly.</p>
<p>Being angry just makes you a candidate for a stroke.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;30&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longing for Holiday</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17203</link>
		<dc:creator>Longing for Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17203</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I think we are just kids in grown-up clothing and more allegedly "sophisticated" ways to pick teams, tattle-tale, call each other names, etc., etc. Sometimes not so sophisticated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I think we are just kids in grown-up clothing and more allegedly &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; ways to pick teams, tattle-tale, call each other names, etc., etc. Sometimes not so sophisticated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17197</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17197</guid>
		<description>I think it's rampant feelings of dissatisfaction and lack of fulfillment.  We're in a stat of flux most of the time, nursing childhood traumas that were never dealt with and we allow them to escalate in aduthood.

It would be easy to bury the past, but unless painful issues are properly dealt with, they'll keep resurfacing until they are.  What made "Steve" call me what he called me?  I can ONLY imagine the pathology we're dealing with here.

And it could be because he's just a mean, lousy human being.  There are bad apples, you know. People who are just inherantly evil.  Basing everything he's ever said to me, he falls under that category.  Some would say sociopaths are made not formed.  I'd bet shrinks would make an expception in his case.

I think another problem is that we depend on others to be barometers of our self worth.  We let opinions...even that of total strangers shape us.   How wrong that is!

We've got to get a handle on our insecurities and irrational behaviors.  We need to stop and think things through and not be so quick to knee jerk reactions.

It's not that we need to win the arguement, it's that we argue fairly.  But in the heat of battle, that kind of logic gets about as lost as logic.

Sad.

I can make a remotely  educated guess as to what the problem, might be but I'm completely stymied as to how to fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s rampant feelings of dissatisfaction and lack of fulfillment.  We&#8217;re in a stat of flux most of the time, nursing childhood traumas that were never dealt with and we allow them to escalate in aduthood.</p>
<p>It would be easy to bury the past, but unless painful issues are properly dealt with, they&#8217;ll keep resurfacing until they are.  What made &#8220;Steve&#8221; call me what he called me?  I can ONLY imagine the pathology we&#8217;re dealing with here.</p>
<p>And it could be because he&#8217;s just a mean, lousy human being.  There are bad apples, you know. People who are just inherantly evil.  Basing everything he&#8217;s ever said to me, he falls under that category.  Some would say sociopaths are made not formed.  I&#8217;d bet shrinks would make an expception in his case.</p>
<p>I think another problem is that we depend on others to be barometers of our self worth.  We let opinions&#8230;even that of total strangers shape us.   How wrong that is!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got to get a handle on our insecurities and irrational behaviors.  We need to stop and think things through and not be so quick to knee jerk reactions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that we need to win the arguement, it&#8217;s that we argue fairly.  But in the heat of battle, that kind of logic gets about as lost as logic.</p>
<p>Sad.</p>
<p>I can make a remotely  educated guess as to what the problem, might be but I&#8217;m completely stymied as to how to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longing for Holiday</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17196</link>
		<dc:creator>Longing for Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 18:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17196</guid>
		<description>No apology needed. My point was that while I didn't mention a locale, the sterotype is so well known (not to mention the word choice), most readers would recognize the locale.  Even my friends from down here make that joke! So, the stereotype about New Yorkers is just as well known. Both stereotypes have some truth in them or they wouldn't exist.  What's needed is honesty with kindness. Not fake kindness or uncaring directness. I've found the honesty with kindness both places. 

Why do you think people are so rude and tactless?  I mean, what's underneath?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No apology needed. My point was that while I didn&#8217;t mention a locale, the sterotype is so well known (not to mention the word choice), most readers would recognize the locale.  Even my friends from down here make that joke! So, the stereotype about New Yorkers is just as well known. Both stereotypes have some truth in them or they wouldn&#8217;t exist.  What&#8217;s needed is honesty with kindness. Not fake kindness or uncaring directness. I&#8217;ve found the honesty with kindness both places. </p>
<p>Why do you think people are so rude and tactless?  I mean, what&#8217;s underneath?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17190</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17190</guid>
		<description>"Precious" is a common catch phrase and often a term of endearment in the south.  I apologize if I presumed "locale".

But I still stand behind my premise that it's a damn shame we have to deal with rude, tactless behavior on a daily basis.  Whether it's on 6th Ave in New York City or Peach Street in Altanta or at Hollywood and Vine.  It's regrettable.  

My comment to you, while coming across completely Pollyanna-ish, still has validity.  That we have to deal with two faced hypocrisy or vile, uncontrolled rage like "Steve's" is a shame. I don't help matters by reacting to his comment as I did, but I've never claimed to be a paragon of virtue either. 

People espouse following Jesus and his teachings.  And if not Jesus, then Buddha...Allah...pick a deity.  The problem..as I see it...is  that some of these people rarely practice what they preach.    

I make no bones about who I am and who I'm not.  I have significant spiritual questions.  I won't profess to be so arrogant as to claim that I am anything but human and flawed and errant. I have my good points too, but it's that, coupled with my flaws that makes me refuse to label my compassion.   It's my opinion that if I did, it would make me an even bigger hypocrite.   For those who label yet still sin?  That makes them hypocrites, too.   The worst kind in my book.

All I can do is vow to try harder.  

I think we all can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Precious&#8221; is a common catch phrase and often a term of endearment in the south.  I apologize if I presumed &#8220;locale&#8221;.</p>
<p>But I still stand behind my premise that it&#8217;s a damn shame we have to deal with rude, tactless behavior on a daily basis.  Whether it&#8217;s on 6th Ave in New York City or Peach Street in Altanta or at Hollywood and Vine.  It&#8217;s regrettable.  </p>
<p>My comment to you, while coming across completely Pollyanna-ish, still has validity.  That we have to deal with two faced hypocrisy or vile, uncontrolled rage like &#8220;Steve&#8217;s&#8221; is a shame. I don&#8217;t help matters by reacting to his comment as I did, but I&#8217;ve never claimed to be a paragon of virtue either. </p>
<p>People espouse following Jesus and his teachings.  And if not Jesus, then Buddha&#8230;Allah&#8230;pick a deity.  The problem..as I see it&#8230;is  that some of these people rarely practice what they preach.    </p>
<p>I make no bones about who I am and who I&#8217;m not.  I have significant spiritual questions.  I won&#8217;t profess to be so arrogant as to claim that I am anything but human and flawed and errant. I have my good points too, but it&#8217;s that, coupled with my flaws that makes me refuse to label my compassion.   It&#8217;s my opinion that if I did, it would make me an even bigger hypocrite.   For those who label yet still sin?  That makes them hypocrites, too.   The worst kind in my book.</p>
<p>All I can do is vow to try harder.  </p>
<p>I think we all can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longing for Holiday</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17189</link>
		<dc:creator>Longing for Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17189</guid>
		<description>Did I say "Southerners?"

I started to read the Steve's post, but decided it wasn't worth my time. I know what you mean about wanting to defend yourself. I have a hard time not doing so, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I say &#8220;Southerners?&#8221;</p>
<p>I started to read the Steve&#8217;s post, but decided it wasn&#8217;t worth my time. I know what you mean about wanting to defend yourself. I have a hard time not doing so, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17179</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 04:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17179</guid>
		<description>Well Longing for Holiday,  

I love NYC.  It has an energy I can snort.  Yet, I also love the slower, genteel pace of the South too.  

If you read the comments of this post, then you can see rude, tactless people exist in every geographic corner of the planet.  Nothing should ever replace civility and decorum.    

I am, of course, referring to "Steve's" comment.   I should've eliminated it immediately and never responded, but I have this need to defend myself when attacked.  Besides that, the abject vileness of his comment actually punctuated the point of my post.   Even so, I was wrong for losing my temper. 

That being said, the hypocrisy you mention, knows no regional boundaries either.

You say you prefer "the directness" of NYers as opposed to the "two faced" nature of Southerners.  If that works for you, fine.  Personally, I'm saddened by the fact that rudeness exists at all.

LK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Longing for Holiday,  </p>
<p>I love NYC.  It has an energy I can snort.  Yet, I also love the slower, genteel pace of the South too.  </p>
<p>If you read the comments of this post, then you can see rude, tactless people exist in every geographic corner of the planet.  Nothing should ever replace civility and decorum.    </p>
<p>I am, of course, referring to &#8220;Steve&#8217;s&#8221; comment.   I should&#8217;ve eliminated it immediately and never responded, but I have this need to defend myself when attacked.  Besides that, the abject vileness of his comment actually punctuated the point of my post.   Even so, I was wrong for losing my temper. </p>
<p>That being said, the hypocrisy you mention, knows no regional boundaries either.</p>
<p>You say you prefer &#8220;the directness&#8221; of NYers as opposed to the &#8220;two faced&#8221; nature of Southerners.  If that works for you, fine.  Personally, I&#8217;m saddened by the fact that rudeness exists at all.</p>
<p>LK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longing for Holiday</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17178</link>
		<dc:creator>Longing for Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17178</guid>
		<description>Laurie: Am I glad I stuck around your post to the end. Having lived in many parts of the country including NYC, I'll take the City over almost any place else I've lived. I still consider my NYC friends my best-friends-for-life. And tho New Yorkers seem rude by their fast pace and in-your-face-ness, I never found one who wouldn't stop and help out if I asked. Frankly, I WAY prefer the directness of NYers (WYSIWYG) to the hypocrisy in my current locale where "precious" to your face means "bitch" behind your back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie: Am I glad I stuck around your post to the end. Having lived in many parts of the country including NYC, I&#8217;ll take the City over almost any place else I&#8217;ve lived. I still consider my NYC friends my best-friends-for-life. And tho New Yorkers seem rude by their fast pace and in-your-face-ness, I never found one who wouldn&#8217;t stop and help out if I asked. Frankly, I WAY prefer the directness of NYers (WYSIWYG) to the hypocrisy in my current locale where &#8220;precious&#8221; to your face means &#8220;bitch&#8221; behind your back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karol</title>
		<link>http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/stereotypes/#comment-17171</link>
		<dc:creator>Karol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lauriekendrick.wordpress.com/?p=2181#comment-17171</guid>
		<description>PM needs to analyze this guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PM needs to analyze this guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
